🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial move to prohibit social networking access for young people below 16 is sending ripples internationally. Politicians, safety advocates, and parents are observing with great interest to see if this approach will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

European Trend

In Europe, a increasing chorus of nations are exploring similar measures.

• The Danish government has stated a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader arguing that phones and apps are "taking away our kids' innocence". Legislation may be passed soon.
• Norway is set to implement a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to protect the young from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to confirm the age and identity of social media account holders. Officials have indicated that an similar ban remains "a potential tools on the table".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on the legislature to enact a proposal increasing the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has endorsed a comparable step, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has recommended guardians to prevent their kids from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has adopted a symbolic resolution demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 without guardian approval is granted. Although it warns of the "habit-forming" quality of these services, the resolution does not create mandatory rules.

"An effective age restriction is a good starting point," stated a leading European lawmaker supporting the resolution.

Britain: A Cautious Approach

For the United Kingdom, the administration has remained open to a possible ban, stating that "no option is off the table" but maintaining any policy must be "supported by robust research".

Previously, interest gathered behind a legislative effort to introduce limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately weakened. Instead, the administration committed to investigate the topic.

Charities have raised apprehensions. An organization established by the loved ones of a teenager who died after encountering dangerous social media material suggests that a simple age ban could fail to protect children and could result in a "cliff edge" of harm when young people reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the failure of the tech sector to design products and services that are secure and age appropriate for minors," said a influential peer.

The United States: A Fragmented Landscape

Stateside, regulation is largely happening at the state government level amid country-wide stalemate.

• Utah demands parental consent for under-18s to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a law barring under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a regulation restricting minors to a single hour of social media use per day, with extra use requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed laws mandating parental consent for under-16s to set up social media presences.

Even with cross-party agreement and proposals from certain individuals to mimic Australia's lead, a US-wide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Global Outlook

Outside of the West, additional countries are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

However, international organizations strike a more nuanced stance. Unicef has advised that age-based restrictions have downsides and "may even prove counterproductive". The agency points out that the internet can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable youth and that government action should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to prioritize child safeguards.

As this global conversation evolves, the policies of this nation and several other countries indicate that governments around the world are less and less prepared to delay for platforms to self-regulate.