🔗 Share this article

In contemporary Britain, public demonstration is no longer a basic freedom. Rather, it has become a privilege that those in power grant or deny as they see fit. This represents the implication of new regulations that the ruling administration is putting forward, which would determine when and where demonstrations can occur, with possible imprisonment for those who defy these restrictions.

Erosion of Democratic Rights

Earlier administrations had already weakened this fundamental freedom: the former Conservative government had granted law enforcement sweeping additional powers, which global rights bodies had censured as "serious and unjustified restrictions" on democratic freedoms. Collectively, these progressive attacks on liberty have practically eliminated the historically earned right to freedom of protest.

Exploiting Tragedy to Rationalize Suppression

The most recent restrictive measures are being defended by citing last week's terrible antisemitic attack on a British mosque. We can all agree on widespread consensus that the safety of British Jews must be safeguarded. However, employing this horrific incident as a justification to stifle dissent is not only disconnected to that duty but perverts it.

"When you cannot draw the line at mass killing, you probably can't draw the line at democracy," observed a well-known American author, a statement that applies equally for the present administration.

Historical Perspective of Protest

Consider Britain's long tradition of public demonstration and direct action against racism and authoritarianism, from the historic 1936 Cable Street confrontation to after World War II Jewish groups opposing fascism and the 1970s demonstrations against the National Front. Many of these historical demonstrators were labeled as radicals in their era, even while they were advocating the freedoms of minorities.

Current Reality

In today's complex situation, here's what's actually occurring: The Israeli government – a foreign state – is perpetrating acts that international bodies have characterized as genocide. Its military actions have prompted the global justice body to release arrest warrants against Israel's prime minister and his ex-military leader.

Western public opinion has shifted dramatically against Israel's violent actions. In Britain, a large percentage of citizens think Israel has likely committed international law violations. Most people would endorse a total prohibition on arms sales to the state, and approve the detention of the Israeli leader.

Suppressing Opposition

Having essentially lost the argument, pro-Israel advocates are now exploiting a despicable anti-Jewish attack to attempt to silence a mass movement against a moral catastrophe. The British government seems included in this effort. Government officials have not enacted comprehensive sanctions on Israel and have permitted weapon shipments to proceed.

People who are demonstrating against the destruction of Gaza have been labeled as hateful extremists. Yet there's a significant reason why there hasn't been a broader crackdown on these demonstrators until now: extremely few protesters have made truly offensive statements about Jewish people, giving police authorities little justification to take action.

Dangerous Conflation

Equating Jewish heritage with the actions of the government of Israel is not only manipulative but also dangerous. The standard interpretation of anti-Jewish prejudice, adopted by the British government and many organizations, has been rightly challenged for potentially restricting legitimate criticism of Israel. However, there should be no disagreement about one of its central illustrations: that "holding Jewish people generally accountable for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes prejudice against Jews.

Escalating Restrictions

This is why we've arrived at a point where law enforcement can propose that demonstrations criticizing Israel's policies should be called off because they might "inadvertently or deliberately" support anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, political figures have stated that recognition of Palestinian statehood has made organizations "implicated" in supposed mistreatment experienced by British Jews.

Double Standards

On the same day as the synagogue attack, the Israel's army killed dozens of Palestinians in Gaza – adding to the terrible count from two years of ongoing violence that have claimed tens of thousands of human lives. British politicians and media outlets have barely concealed the limited value they assign to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the most brazen expressions of racism in our time.

Crossing Thresholds

Our government has already passed a dangerous boundary by proscribing a specific activist group, a peaceful, human rights-focused activist collective. Multiple thousands of British protesters have been arrested, primarily for holding signs opposing mass killing and endorsing the proscribed group. Many of those arrested are pensioners; among them a retired priest and the daughter of a World War II genocide survivor.

Global Comparisons

It's easy to see where this trajectory leads. In the United States, political leaders helped demonize demonstrations supporting Palestine: a ex-political leader implied that some were "linked with" foreign governments, while the current president described such protests as antisemitic. In doing so, they contributed to normalizing the authoritarian crackdown on such demonstrations – and on free speech in general.

Future Concerns

If a hard-right government comes to power, it would be given extensive authority to control dissent. What might a Reform government do with this restrictive framework? Our forebears struggled, suffered and died to secure our liberties. We may eventually rue how casually we permitted them to be eroded.